Skip to Local Navigation
Skip to Content
California State University, Long BeachCalifornia State University, Long Beach
Skip to Content

California State University, Long Beach 2008-2009 Resource Planning Process

Form 3 - Budget Impact Reduction Statement

IMPACT STATEMENTS

Identify department/service area or activity that will be impacted by a base and/or non-base reduction in fiscal year 2008/09.
Where appropriate, please show mitigation of reduction utilizing carryover funds.

COLLEGE OF EDUCATION

  FTE Base Reduction
<a> 		Non-Base Reduction
<b>		 Use of Carryover
+c		 Total
<a>+ <b> +c = Total
Impact to Instruction (RPP) $(273,457) $- $273,457 $-
Impact to Instruction (Unavoidable additional costs) - $(503,600) $- $30,047 $(473,553)
Total Budget Problem (8.11) $(777,057) $- $303,504 $(473,553)
Campus Goal Student Retention and Graduation
Solution Strategy Consolidate sections
Note
  • Impacts: Plans to  consolidate sections will have sufficient capacity to accommodate student demand, but we may lose students due to their being unable to accommodate their schedules. In addition, we may be cutting sections that are taught by expert teacher/practitioners, who greatly enrich the programs.
Campus Goal Student Retention and Graduation
Solution Strategy Cancel low enrolled or non-required courses
Note
  • Impacts: The more aggressive efforts to cancel low enrolled classes and non-required courses could potentially affect majors in the CED as well as students enrolled in the curriculum from other Colleges. The CED has a department (EDPAC) offering small and medium size master's programs which will be challenged to enforce cancelling low enrolled classes without ultimately impeding timely progress to program completion.
Campus Goal Enhancing the Quality of Faculty and Staff
Solution Strategy Reduce assigned time 
Note
  • Impacts: By cutting approximately 10% of assigned time, we will be reducing support available for highly successful academic programs such as the Urban Teaching Academy, as well as service for schools and community agencies. 
Campus Goal Enhancing the Quality of Faculty and Staff
Solution Strategy Other
Note
  • Impacts: Faculty resignations and retirements require the college to hire four tenure track replacement faculty and two full time lecturers in the ongoing effort to provide quality instruction for our students. The college will utilize temporary solutions to backfill the instructional needs. Additional resources will be needed from the Division level.  
  FTE Base Reduction
<a> 		Non-Base Reduction
<b>		 Use of Carryover
+c		 Total
<a>+ <b> +c = Total
Impact to Instruction Support (RPP) - $(89,773) $(47,672) $89,773 $(47,672)
Impact to Instruction Support (Unavoidable additional costs) - $- $- $- $-
Total Budget Problem - $(89,773) $(47,672) $89,773 $(47,672)
Campus Goal Enhancing the Quality of Faculty and Staff
Solution Strategy Reduce Staff (temp help or perm) expenditures
Note
  • Impacts: Base reduction will require the college to recruit for temporary staff appointments to fill permanent positions.  Recruitment of temporary staff will negatively impact the quality of work load efficiency.  The college is utilizing the carryover funds to cover the budget reduction and the loss of budget recovery plan non-base funds.  This temporary solution will impact the college's operational needs and hamper on-going projects.  Restoration of these funds will be needed to cover salaries of current temporary staff appointments who primarily advise students. 
Campus Goal Fiscal Resources and Quality Improvement
Solution Strategy Reduce operating expense and equipment expenditures
Note
  • Impacts: Departments and offices will have fewer supplies and must reduce day-to-day operational costs.  There will be less funds for faculty travel.
  FTE Base Reduction
<a>		 Non-Base Reduction
<b>		 Use of Carryover
+c		 Total
<a> <b> +c = Total
TOTAL COLLEGE OF EDUCATION (8.11) $(866,830) $(47,672) $393,277 $(521,225)
Academic Affairs
B(11)
Previous Page