Skip to Local Navigation
Skip to Content
California State University, Long BeachCalifornia State University, Long Beach

2005 General Staff and Faculty Survey Results

Legend

Positive answers at 80% and above are indicated by green. Positive responses between 60% and 79.9% are indicated by yellow. Responses less than or equal to 59.9% are indicated by red.

Controller's Office

Rating levels of satisfaction with the following attributes of the Controller's Office

All Staff + Faculty

Attribute Scale % Satisfied # of Resp.
Overall satisfaction with services provided 3.10 89.9% 258
Timeliness of travel and expense reimbursement 3.00 85.1% 235
Ease of travel reimbursement process 2.94 80.1% 221
The Controller's Office provides adequate communication regarding matters affecting the campus community 2.89 77.9% 226
Total Respondents     402 

Facilities Management

Rating levels of satisfaction with the following attributes of Facilities Management

All Staff + Faculty

Attribute Scale % Satisfied # of Resp.
Overall satisfaction with services provided 3.19 90.8% 433
Attractive and visually appealing campus grounds 3.54 96.3% 434
Quality of Exterior public area maintenance (litter gum on walks trash cans cigarette urns general cleanliness) 3.26 88.0% 440
Quality of interior lighting 3.15 87.4% 438
Quality of exterior lighting 3.10 84.5% 427
Building components function as they should (e.g. doors locks floor coverings white boards stairwells etc.) 3.09 84.6% 435
Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning function well (note many buildings do not have A/C) 2.71 65.7% 429
If dissatisfied with heating/air are you satisfied with FM response to hot/cold calls? 2.96 79.2% 308
Customer Service Center is helpful in resolving issues 3.17 87.5% 337
Timeliness of response to service requests 3.05 82.0% 366
Total Respondents     447

Quality of Custodial Services for: All Staff + Faculty

Area Scale % Satisfied # of Resp.
Office 3.06 78.6% 421
Restrooms 2.94 74.8% 436
Public Areas 3.18 91.2% 432
Total Respondents     444

Mail Services

Rating levels of satisfaction with the following attributes of Mail Services

All Staff + Faculty

Attribute Scale % Satisfied # of Resp.
Overall satisfaction with the services provided 2.82 72.4% 406
Timeliness of mail delivery to you 2.70 65.3% 406
Accuracy of mail delivery 2.76 71.6% 398
Timeliness of mail delivery to intended recipient when you are the sender 2.72 65.1% 367
Information or training on the preparation of mail delivery 2.78 71.5% 242
Total Respondents     518

Parking and Transportation Services

Rating levels of satisfaction with the following attributes of Parking and Transportation Services

All Staff + Faculty

Attribute Scale % Satisfied # of Resp.
The ease of obtaining an employee permit 3.41 94.0% 415
The accessibility of our services 3.30 93.9% 409
The staff advice regarding your parking needs 3.23 87.3% 369
The overall experience with parking facilities (lot conditions landscape cleanliness lighting) 3.22 88.2% 417
The overall experience with parking equipment (gate arm gate key cards) 3.23 92.8% 414
The overall experience with parking information (signage lot closure notification message boards web site maps events radio station) 3.11 85.3% 401
The overall experience with peak demand efforts (staff assistance radio station off-campus parking & shuttle) 3.02 82.8% 326
Total Respondents     435

Payroll and Benefits Services

Rating levels of satisfaction with the following attributes of Payroll and Benefits Services

Attribute Scale % Satisfied # of Resp.
Overall satisfaction with the services provided 3.38 94.6% 406
Ease of contacting Payroll/Benefits over the phone 3.31 88.3% 360
Ease of contacting Payroll/Benefits by email 3.38 93.3% 238
Effective problem resolution 3.30 90.8% 347
Timely response to your requests 3.33 90.7% 377
Knowledge and professionalism of staff 3.44 94.7% 397
Total Respondents     426

Purchasing Department

Rating levels of satisfaction with the following attributes of the Purchasing Department

All Staff + Faculty

Attribute Scale % Satisfied # of Resp.
Overall satisfaction with services provided 3.09 87.7% 195
Efficiency of Procurement Credit Card purchase option 3.35 94.1% 119
Usefulness of Procurement Credit Card purchase option 3.33 94.0% 117
Variety of methods to purchase goods and services 3.06 85.5% 172
Accessibility of staff when needed 3.10 83.9% 180
Time between initiating a requisition and receipt of goods/services 2.82 71.0% 183
Total Respondents     390

Staff Personnel Services Training Development Program

Rating levels of satisfaction with the following attributes of Staff Personnel Services Training and Development Program

All Staff Only

Attribute Scale % Satisfied # of Resp.
Overall satisfaction with the services provided 3.30 92.6% 231
Quality of Course offerings 3.26 89.9% 218
Variety of Course offerings 3.13 84.8% 224
Convenient scheduling 3.27 91.7% 217
Quality of instruction 3.35 93.8% 208
Ease of registering for training classes via the web 3.50 95.0% 202
Total Respondents     274

Information Technology Services

ITS Staff

Rating levels of satisfaction with the following attributes of Information Technology Services

Staff Only

Attribute Scale % Satisfied # of Resp.
Overall satisfaction with the services provided 3.32 95.0% 281
Effectiveness of desktop support 3.30 90.7% 269
Timeliness of desktop support resolutions 3.24 88.3% 265
Lotus Notes performance 3.40 95.7% 255
Responsiveness of ITS to technology requests 3.31 91.0% 255
Effectiveness of ITS solutions 3.30 91.1% 248
Availability of telephone (voice network) 3.42 96.6% 266
Availability of data network 3.39 97.2% 251
Total Respondents     305

ITS Faculty

Rating levels of satisfaction with the following attributes of Information Technology Services

Faculty Only

Attribute Scale % Satisfied # of Resp.
Performance of campus email 3.23 88.8% 107
Availability of Beachboard 3.23 86.9% 99
Functions available on campus telephone system 3.00 80.8% 104
Total Respondents     114

University Police

Rating levels of satisfaction with the following attributes of University Police

All Staff + Faculty

Attribute Scale % Satisfied # of Resp.
Overall satisfaction with the services provided 3.36 94.3% 335
Ease and quality of CSO escort service 3.45 97.4% 114
General feeling of safety 3.42 95.6% 385
Visibility of Police 3.28 91.3% 380
Accessibility to services 3.30 93.2% 307
Timeliness of police response 3.26 84.2% 19
Knowledge and professionalism of staff 3.18 72.7% 22
Total Respondents     411

Print Shop and Quick Copy

Rating levels of satisfaction with the following attributes of University Print Shop and Quick Copy

All Staff + Faculty

Attribute Scale % Satisfied # of Resp.
Overall satisfaction with services provided 3.42 89.5% 38
Knowledge and professionalism of staff 3.46 89.2% 37
Ease of use of utilities/forms/procedures 3.31 92.1% 38
Timeliness of Work Performed 3.17 81.6% 38
Quality of Printing 3.53 94.7% 38
Quality of Layout 3.62 94.4% 36
Quality of copy service 3.47 94.4% 36
Price of Work Performed 2.91 75.7% 37
Total Respondents   38

Staff Personnel - Recruiting

Rating levels of satisfaction with the following attributes of Staff Personnel - Recruiting

All Staff Only

Attribute Scale % Satisfied # of Resp.
Overall satisfaction with services provided 2.96 70.8% 24
Timeliness of hiring process for staff/management positions 2.60 52.0% 25
Communication on status of recruitment 2.75 66.7% 24
Appropriate classification determination 2.68 63.6% 22
Knowledge and professionalism of staff 3.00 81.8% 22
Ease of use of forms and procedures for hiring 2.80 65.0% 20
Total Respondents     25

Safety and Risk Management

Rating levels of satisfaction with the following attributes of Safety and Risk Management

All Staff + Faculty

Attribute Scale % Satisfied # of Resp.
Overall satisfaction with services provided 3.54 92.9% 28
Ease of use of forms and procedures for S&RM 3.00 84.6% 26
Accessibility of S&RM personnel when needed 3.62 92.6% 27
Knowledge and professionalism of staff 3.64 92.9% 28
Effectiveness of service/advice regarding your issue 3.39 89.3% 28
Effectiveness of web site regarding your issue 3.22 82.4% 18
Effectiveness of training 3.40 90.9% 22
Responsiveness of unit/staff to your request/question 3.50 89.3% 28
Total Respondents     29