Skip to Local Navigation
Skip to Content
California State University, Long BeachCalifornia State University, Long Beach

Student Summary Results & Action Plans

These results show the Student levels of satisfaction for the services listed below. As a result of this survey, select DAF units have created action plans to improve customer satisfaction. For further information on how to interpret results see the "List of Contents and How to Interpret Results Tables" page.

Financial Aid / Business Office

For the following, rate your level of satisfaction for the past 12 months.

Attribute % Satisfied # of Resp.
Courtesy of the Financial Aid staff who work at the windows 84.21% 171
Courtesy of the Financial Aid staff who answer the phone 75.34% 146
Courtesy of the Financial Aid counselors 86.36% 132
Timeliness of receiving my financial aid award notice 82.45% 188
Timeliness of receiving my financial aid award check 75.26% 190
Ability to speak with someone from the Financial Aid staff within an acceptable amount of time 73.42% 158
Financial Aid staff's knowledge about financial aid policies and procedures 81.88% 160
Usefulness of information on the Financial Aid website 83.44% 151
Overall service of the Financial Aid office 84.24% 184
Total Respondents (including "Don't Knows")   237

Financial Aid / Business Office 06/07 Intended Action Items

  • Implement a direct deposit option for financial aid disbursements, allowing for more timely deposit of funds.  Actively promote the benefits of this option.
  • Incorporate periodic quality discussions as part of regular staff meetings via case studies and customer service examples/scenarios.
  • Create and evaluate an issues log of student barriers to graduation.
  • Establish clearer protocol for phone referrals and follow-up.
  • Review training and identify opportunities for phone and peer staff to increase knowledge.
  • Identify opportunities to provide timely updates/reminders to students (e.g., direct personalized emails, application tips/reminders for financial aid students regarding next year's application for aid).

Academic Support and Student Relations

Rating most recent interaction with Enrollment Services when visiting the windows located in the Brotman Hall courtyard:

Attribute % Sat # Resp
Courtesy of the staff person assisting you at the windows 88.6% 140
Knowledge of the staff person (Were they well informed?) 89.1% 138
Helpfulness 85.6% 139
Amount of time waiting in line 67.2% 137
Overall satisfaction with the Enrollment Services windows 85.5% 138
Total Respondents   140

Rating the first person talked to over the phone during most recent interaction with Enrollment Services:

Attribute % Sat # Resp
Courtesy of the staff person assisting you at the windows 83.0% 53
Knowledge of the staff person (Were they well informed?) 71.7% 53
Helpfulness 71.2% 52
Amount of time waiting in line 65.4% 52
Overall satisfaction with the Enrollment Services windows 77.4% 53
Total Respondents   53

Academic Support and Student Relations 06/07 Intended Action Items

  • Continue analysis of peak times/days/weeks for phone calls and window traffic.
  • Continue current plan for hiring staff to provide optimal window/phone coverage.
  • Continue to investigate options for scheduling/hiring Student Relations and/or other Enrollment Services staff and/or student assistants to answer phones at peak times.
  • Investigate solutions to space constraints for adding additional phone support.
  • Investigate options for prescreening phone calls to reroute calls not intended for Enrollment Services.

Records and Evaluations

Satisfaction with the Transfer Credit Evaluation process:

Attribute % Sat # Resp
Ease of understanding the transfer credit evaluation process 78.6% 252
Timeliness of transfer credit evaluation 68.9% 244
Timeliness of adjustments to your record 68.6% 239
Accuracy of adjustments to your record 75.3% 243
Helpfulness of the Enrollment Services staff 70.6% 231
Overall satisfaction with the transfer credit evaluation process 74.6% 244
Total Respondents   256

Satisfaction with the Degree Progress Report:

Attribute % Sat # Resp
Ease of using the Degree Progress Report 77.7% 206
Usefulness of the Degree Progress Report 86.3% 204
Understandability of the Degree Progress Report 65.9% 205
Helpfulness of the Enrollment services staff in answering questions related to the Degree Progress Report 73.9% 138
Overall satisfaction with the Degree Progress Report 78.8% 203
Total Respondents   208

Satisfaction with the Transcripts Request and Fulfillment process:

Attribute % Sat # Resp
Accessibility of information telling you how to request your official transcripts 81.7% 60
Ease of requesting your official transcripts 78.7% 61
Helpfulness of staff at the Enrollment Services windows at Brotman Hall 81.5% 54
Timeliness of processing official transcript requests 68.4% 57
Accuracy of processing official transcript requests 89.7% 58
Overall satisfaction with official transcript process 78.3% 60
Total Respondents   61

Records and Evaluations 06/07 Intended Action Items

Transfer Credit Evaluation

  • Develop a comprehensive section on the Enrollment Services Web site explaining the transfer credit evaluation. Ensure that links to this new site are provided in all relevant e-mail communication—and that the URL is provided in all relevant hard-copy communication.

Degree Progress Report

  • Continue campus and system-wide efforts to redesign and streamline the Degree Progress Report. Expedite implementation of marketing plan to promote use by students of the Degree Progress Report and implement a comprehensive training curriculum for faculty academic advisers, with special emphasis on use of the Degree Progress Report as an advising tool.

Transcript Request and Fulfillment

  • Promote and publicize the use of the new on-line transcript ordering system with an eye to the eventual elimination of hard-copy transcript requests from enrolled students.