Skip to Local Navigation
Skip to Content
California State University, Long BeachCalifornia State University, Long Beach

ASMs/DFO Summary Results

Budget Management

Rating levels of satisfaction with the following attributes of Budget Management

Attribute 2005 % Sat 2005 # Resp 2006 % Sat 2006 # Resp 2007 % Sat 2007 # Resp
Timely and accurate budget data provided upon request 100.0%18100.0%16100.0%16
Responsiveness to and correction of payroll distribution errors 94.0%1893.3%1592.9%14
Timeliness of response to inquiries     100.0%16
Timeliness of budget transfers and Position Action Forms 94.0%18100.0%1587.5%16
Provides adequate support for budget projections/Financial Assessment     84.6%13
Value of the Internal Budget Document (IBD)     100.0%13
Overall satisfaction with the services provided 100.0%18100.0%16100.0%16

Total respondents (including "Don't Knows"):

  • 2005: 18
  • 2006: 17
  • 2007: 17

Controller's Office

Rating levels of satisfaction with the following attributes of the Controller's Office

Attribute 2005 % Sat 2005 # Resp 2006 % Sat 2006 # Resp 2007 % Sat 2007 # Resp
Knowledge and professionalism of staff 100.0%1886.7%1580.0%15
Effective problem resolution     50.0%16
Responsiveness of staff to your request/question 89.0%1893.3%1568.8%16
Clear easy to follow policies and procedures 76.0%1766.7%1550.0%16
Usefulness of content available on Controller's website (forms, polices, procedures)     71.4%14
Timeliness of payments to vendors 83.0%1880.0%1543.8%16
Accuracy of payments to vendors     87.5%16
Effective handling of invoices 83.0%1873.3%1550.0%16
Timeliness of travel and expense reimbursement     37.5%16
Accuracy of travel reimbursement     93.8%16
Timeliness of GL changes and/or adjustments 83.0%1892.9%1484.6%13
Timing of Financial Assessment (Sept, Dec, Mar)     40.0%15
Usefulness of Financial Assessment to you     50.0%14
Overall satisfaction with the services provided 100.0%1773.3%1553.3%15

Total respondents (including "Don't Knows"):

  • 2005: 19
  • 2006: 16
  • 2007: 17

Controllers 07/08 Intended Action Items

  • Work with Quality Improvement staff to create 2 process improvement teams (FIX team – 1 Travel; 1- Vendors) to review current processes and statistics and identify possible process improvements. This process will be completed in 2 phases and will include Accounts Payable team members, Controller, Quality Improvement personnel and customers (ASM’s). An implementation timeline would also be created.
  • Collection of data measures and statistics for use in the FIX teams.
  • Recruitment of Travel supervisor and one additional staff member.

Employee Relations

Rating levels of satisfaction with the following attributes of Employee Relations

Attribute 2007 % Sat 2007 # Resp
Effectiveness of advice or recommended action 100.0%16
Responsiveness to your initial contact 100.0%16
Timeliness of actions regarding your issue 87.5%16
Timeliness of communication regarding next steps 87.5%16
Effective investigation of grievances and/or complaints 100.0%8
Effective investigation efforts throughout the disciplinary process 87.5%8
The extent to which the training provided by Employee Relations is helpful in carrying out your related management duties 85.7%14
Overall satisfaction with services provided 100.0%16

Total respondents (including "Don't Knows"):

  • 2007: 16

Employee Relations 07/08 Intended Action Items

  • Distribute Request for Discipline Process outline, which includes a detailed description of discipline process, to appropriate management personnel, upon first request of disciplinary action.
  • Make weekly contact with appropriate management personnel regarding any active/outstanding issues (grievances, complaints, discipline, requests for information, etc.)

Facilities Management

Rating levels of satisfaction with the following attributes of Facilities Management

Attribute 2005 % Sat 2005 # Resp 2006 % Sat 2006 # Resp 2007 % Sat 2007 # Resp
Knowledge and professionalism of staff 94.0%17100.0%1588.2%17
Ease of use of key issue process 88.0%1685.7%1485.7%14
The electronic work order meets my needs 100.0%1285.7%1453.8%13
Timeliness of billing process 59.0%1780.0%1537.5%16
Accuracy of the billing process 89.0%1873.3%1550.0%16
Timeliness of response to routine requests 83.0%1881.3%1676.5%17
Timeliness of response to urgent/emergency problems 88.0%1793.8%1682.4%17
Quality of landscaping and grounds 89.0%1893.8%1687.5%16
Quality of custodial services provided 75.0%1693.8%1664.7%17
Overall satisfaction with the services provided 82.0%1793.8%1676.5%17

Total respondents (including "Don't Knows"):

  • 2005: 19
  • 2006: 16
  • 2007: 17

Facilities Management 07/08 Intended Action Items

HVAC

  • A detailed analysis was done for year 2006 to determine which facilities generated most of the HVAC complaints. It was found that the majority of complaints were from buildings where construction activities impaired HVAC service delivery. A detailed analysis will be done for survey year 2007 in order to determine if there continues to be a causal relationship between construction activities and service delivery failure, or if improvements recently completed help to increase customer satisfaction.
  • Enhance communication efforts with the campus community in regards to what services are to be expected, state regulations for heating and cooling, and suggestions for making the environment more comfortable.
  • Renew effort between the Engineering and Customer Service Center staff to provide feedback directly to customers who have concerns regarding HVAC comfort.
  • Continue the highest level of maintenance possible (within funding) to mechanical systems to assure reliable operations.

Exterior Lighting

  • Exterior lighting projects have been completed and improvements have been made. Projects are ongoing to continue to improve the exterior lighting. Prompt replacement of non-functioning lights is a high priority of the departments.

Custodial Services

  • The customers continue to ask for increased frequencies of service in restrooms, classrooms, and in some cases, offices (Faculty). We are continuously working on improving scheduling effectiveness. Regularly evaluate new tools and equipment to determine the most beneficial cleaning approach. Continue to purchase equipment and modify processes and procedures that further enhance productivity of custodial services.

Financial Management Information System

Rating levels of satisfaction with the following attributes of FMIS

Attribute 2005 % Sat 2005 # Resp 2006 % Sat 2006 # Resp 2007 % Sat 2007 # Resp
Timeliness in completing PS Finance User ID changes 85.0%13100.0%1191.7%12
Responsiveness in resolving issues reported to FIS helpdesk (PS Finance) 83.0%1881.8%1153.8%13
Quality of technical support provided for PeopleSoft Finance System 93.0%1583.3%1266.7%12
Timeliness of weekly and monthly PS Finance reports 94.0%17100.0%1481.3%16
Availability of reports to meet end users needs 83.0%1878.6%1462.5%16
Availability of reliable historical data     73.3%15
Timeliness and quality (meets specifications) of new end user reports requested 77.0%1381.8%1175.0%12
Overall satisfaction with services provided 94.0%1786.7%1581.3%16

Total respondents (including "Don't Knows"):

  • 2005: 18
  • 2006: 16
  • 2007: 17

Financial Management Information Systems 07/08 Intended Action Items

  • Work with Quality Improvement staff to arrange a focus group of ASM’s to obtain additional details.
  • Quality improvement staff to obtain additional details from ASM’s independently.
  • FMIS team to identify and implement process improvements to address issues identified by ASM’s.

Mail Services

Rating levels of satisfaction with the following attributes of Mail Services

Attribute 2005 % Sat 2005 # Resp 2006 % Sat 2006 # Resp 2007 % Sat 2007 # Resp
Timeliness of mail delivery to you 64.0%1493.8%1676.5%17
Accuracy of mail delivery 69.0%1687.5%1668.8%16
Timeliness of mail delivery to intended recipient when you are the sender 69.0%1381.3%1673.3%15
Consistency of mail delivery/pick-up time     87.5%16
Information or training on the preparation of mail delivery 67.0%1281.8% 11 88.9%9
Accuracy of mail charges     53.8%13
Provides adequate communication regarding matters affecting the campus community (e.g. mail schedule changes in policies services provided etc)   85.7%1475.0%16
Overall satisfaction with the services provided 63.0%1687.5%1693.3%15

Total respondents (including "Don't Knows"):

  • 2005: 19
  • 2006: 16
  • 2007: 17

Mail 07/08 Intended Action Items

  • For accuracy of mail charges: educate campus on how charges are applied to accounts for mail pieces (workshops or one-to-one as needed).
  • For accuracy of mail delivery: provide informative flyers and meetings to inform campus of mail delivery procedures; encourage campus community to let mailroom know when there are inaccuracies; a method for soliciting feedback will be considered

Payroll Services

Rating levels of satisfaction with the following attributes of Payroll Services

Attribute 2005 % Sat 2005 # Resp 2006 % Sat 2006 # Resp 2007 % Sat 2007 # Resp
Ease of use of forms and procedures for timekeeping 84.0%1994.1%1782.4%17
Timeliness of response to timekeeping questions/requests 94.0%18100.0%1794.1%17
Effective problem resolution 68.0%1982.4%1776.5%17
Effectiveness of Payroll recommendations 83.0%1886.7%1593.3%15
Working relations with your department 95.0%1994.1%1788.2%17
Easy to use Payroll Services website   90.0% 10 90.9%11
Usefulness of payroll self service functions (myCSULB)   80.0%15100.0%12
Provides adequate communication regarding matters affecting employees (e.g. pay schedule, policy changes, deduction explanations, services provided, etc)   64.7%1762.5%16
Overall satisfaction with the services provided 100.0%1994.1%1794.1%17

Total respondents (including "Don't Knows"):

  • 2005: 19
  • 2006: 17
  • 2007: 17

Payroll 07/08 Intended Action Items

  • Providing adequate Communication regarding matters affecting employees.
    • Communicate via e-mail and letters to employees when salary increases are given. This communication attempts to explain the nature of the increase. This information is also provided to the ASMs.
    • Payroll and Benefits Services Front Counter hours will be extended in late August through late September 2007 from 7:30 am to 5:30 pm to assist employees with irregular work hours.
    • Payroll Services already has added “Payroll Pointers” to communicate payroll information to departments.
  • Timely Responses to Requests
    • New TimeEntry system gives timekeepers and approvers more information to employee leave data. This helps reduce issues and questions for payroll tech.

Purchasing

Rating level of satisfaction with the following attributes of Purchasing

Attribute 2005 % Sat 2005 # Resp 2007 % Sat 2007 # Resp
Accessibility of staff when needed 88.0%1787.5%16
Knowledgeable staff 94.0%17100.0%17
Professionalism of staff 94.0%1782.4%17
Clear, easy to follow policies and procedures 88.0%1787.5%16
Effective problem resolution   76.9%13
Accommodating rush and emergency orders 94.0%16100.0%14
Ease of submitting a requisition 94.0%1688.2%17
Time between initiating a requisition and issuing a purchase order 81.0%1685.7%14
Timeliness of receiving goods and/or services from time of requisition 87.0%1587.5%16
Availability of information on the status of my order 81.0%1681.3%16
Promoting competitive bidding & reducing sole source reliance 91.0%1180.0%10
Considers my needs when selecting new vendors   55.6%9
Taking advantage of all vendor discounts that are allowed 93.0%1481.8%11
Efficiency of Procurement Credit Card purchase option 100.0%1862.5%16
Usefulness of Procurement Credit Card purchase option 100.0%1888.2%17
Overall satisfaction with the services provided 94.0%1794.1%17

Total respondents (including "Don't Knows"):

  • 2005: 18
  • 2007: 17

Purchasing 07/08 Intended Action Items

Purchasing’s high priority Opportunities for Improvement relate to training and perception and will be addressed by the combined action items.

  • In addition to the current Purchasing Workshop, provide an annual in-depth training on policies and procedures. Survey the ASM/DFOs for their training wish list
  • Provide a web-based FAQs on Purchasing and the Procurement Card which would address specific issues such as, “Why does Purchasing Change My Vendor” and “When to Use the P-Card”.
  • Create on-line, interactive training manuals for Requisition Entry, Purchase Create, and the Requisition and PO Approval Process.
  • Increase buyer awareness of particular needs of end-users.

Recruiting

Rating levels of satisfaction with the following attributes of Staff Personnel - Recruiting

Attribute 2005 % Sat 2005 # Resp 2007 % Sat 2007 # Resp
Timeliness of hiring process for staff/management positions 52.0%25100.0%17
Communication on status of recruitment 66.7%2494.1%17
Knowledge and professionalism of staff 81.8%2294.1%17
Ease of use of forms and procedures for hiring 65.0% 2093.8%16
Advice on how to effectively advertise for open positions   100.0%17
Advice on how to effectively recruit for open positions (classification, salary range, interview strategies, etc)   100.0%17
The recruiting department as a partner for finding the best new hires   92.9%17
Overall satisfaction with services provided 70.8%24100.0%17

Total respondents (including "Don't Knows"):

  • 2005: 25
  • 2007: 17