Rating levels of satisfaction with the following attributes of Budget Management
| Attribute | 2005 % Sat | 2005 # Resp | 2006 % Sat | 2006 # Resp | 2007 % Sat | 2007 # Resp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Timely and accurate budget data provided upon request | 100.0% | 18 | 100.0% | 16 | 100.0% | 16 |
| Responsiveness to and correction of payroll distribution errors | 94.0% | 18 | 93.3% | 15 | 92.9% | 14 |
| Timeliness of response to inquiries | 100.0% | 16 | ||||
| Timeliness of budget transfers and Position Action Forms | 94.0% | 18 | 100.0% | 15 | 87.5% | 16 |
| Provides adequate support for budget projections/Financial Assessment | 84.6% | 13 | ||||
| Value of the Internal Budget Document (IBD) | 100.0% | 13 | ||||
| Overall satisfaction with the services provided | 100.0% | 18 | 100.0% | 16 | 100.0% | 16 |
Rating levels of satisfaction with the following attributes of the Controller's Office
| Attribute | 2005 % Sat | 2005 # Resp | 2006 % Sat | 2006 # Resp | 2007 % Sat | 2007 # Resp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Knowledge and professionalism of staff | 100.0% | 18 | 86.7% | 15 | 80.0% | 15 |
| Effective problem resolution | 50.0% | 16 | ||||
| Responsiveness of staff to your request/question | 89.0% | 18 | 93.3% | 15 | 68.8% | 16 |
| Clear easy to follow policies and procedures | 76.0% | 17 | 66.7% | 15 | 50.0% | 16 |
| Usefulness of content available on Controller's website (forms, polices, procedures) | 71.4% | 14 | ||||
| Timeliness of payments to vendors | 83.0% | 18 | 80.0% | 15 | 43.8% | 16 |
| Accuracy of payments to vendors | 87.5% | 16 | ||||
| Effective handling of invoices | 83.0% | 18 | 73.3% | 15 | 50.0% | 16 |
| Timeliness of travel and expense reimbursement | 37.5% | 16 | ||||
| Accuracy of travel reimbursement | 93.8% | 16 | ||||
| Timeliness of GL changes and/or adjustments | 83.0% | 18 | 92.9% | 14 | 84.6% | 13 |
| Timing of Financial Assessment (Sept, Dec, Mar) | 40.0% | 15 | ||||
| Usefulness of Financial Assessment to you | 50.0% | 14 | ||||
| Overall satisfaction with the services provided | 100.0% | 17 | 73.3% | 15 | 53.3% | 15 |
Rating levels of satisfaction with the following attributes of Employee Relations
| Attribute | 2007 % Sat | 2007 # Resp |
|---|---|---|
| Effectiveness of advice or recommended action | 100.0% | 16 |
| Responsiveness to your initial contact | 100.0% | 16 |
| Timeliness of actions regarding your issue | 87.5% | 16 |
| Timeliness of communication regarding next steps | 87.5% | 16 |
| Effective investigation of grievances and/or complaints | 100.0% | 8 |
| Effective investigation efforts throughout the disciplinary process | 87.5% | 8 |
| The extent to which the training provided by Employee Relations is helpful in carrying out your related management duties | 85.7% | 14 |
| Overall satisfaction with services provided | 100.0% | 16 |
Rating levels of satisfaction with the following attributes of Facilities Management
| Attribute | 2005 % Sat | 2005 # Resp | 2006 % Sat | 2006 # Resp | 2007 % Sat | 2007 # Resp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Knowledge and professionalism of staff | 94.0% | 17 | 100.0% | 15 | 88.2% | 17 |
| Ease of use of key issue process | 88.0% | 16 | 85.7% | 14 | 85.7% | 14 |
| The electronic work order meets my needs | 100.0% | 12 | 85.7% | 14 | 53.8% | 13 |
| Timeliness of billing process | 59.0% | 17 | 80.0% | 15 | 37.5% | 16 |
| Accuracy of the billing process | 89.0% | 18 | 73.3% | 15 | 50.0% | 16 |
| Timeliness of response to routine requests | 83.0% | 18 | 81.3% | 16 | 76.5% | 17 |
| Timeliness of response to urgent/emergency problems | 88.0% | 17 | 93.8% | 16 | 82.4% | 17 |
| Quality of landscaping and grounds | 89.0% | 18 | 93.8% | 16 | 87.5% | 16 |
| Quality of custodial services provided | 75.0% | 16 | 93.8% | 16 | 64.7% | 17 |
| Overall satisfaction with the services provided | 82.0% | 17 | 93.8% | 16 | 76.5% | 17 |
Rating levels of satisfaction with the following attributes of FMIS
| Attribute | 2005 % Sat | 2005 # Resp | 2006 % Sat | 2006 # Resp | 2007 % Sat | 2007 # Resp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Timeliness in completing PS Finance User ID changes | 85.0% | 13 | 100.0% | 11 | 91.7% | 12 |
| Responsiveness in resolving issues reported to FIS helpdesk (PS Finance) | 83.0% | 18 | 81.8% | 11 | 53.8% | 13 |
| Quality of technical support provided for PeopleSoft Finance System | 93.0% | 15 | 83.3% | 12 | 66.7% | 12 |
| Timeliness of weekly and monthly PS Finance reports | 94.0% | 17 | 100.0% | 14 | 81.3% | 16 |
| Availability of reports to meet end users needs | 83.0% | 18 | 78.6% | 14 | 62.5% | 16 |
| Availability of reliable historical data | 73.3% | 15 | ||||
| Timeliness and quality (meets specifications) of new end user reports requested | 77.0% | 13 | 81.8% | 11 | 75.0% | 12 |
| Overall satisfaction with services provided | 94.0% | 17 | 86.7% | 15 | 81.3% | 16 |
Rating levels of satisfaction with the following attributes of Mail Services
| Attribute | 2005 % Sat | 2005 # Resp | 2006 % Sat | 2006 # Resp | 2007 % Sat | 2007 # Resp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Timeliness of mail delivery to you | 64.0% | 14 | 93.8% | 16 | 76.5% | 17 |
| Accuracy of mail delivery | 69.0% | 16 | 87.5% | 16 | 68.8% | 16 |
| Timeliness of mail delivery to intended recipient when you are the sender | 69.0% | 13 | 81.3% | 16 | 73.3% | 15 |
| Consistency of mail delivery/pick-up time | 87.5% | 16 | ||||
| Information or training on the preparation of mail delivery | 67.0% | 12 | 81.8% | 11 | 88.9% | 9 |
| Accuracy of mail charges | 53.8% | 13 | ||||
| Provides adequate communication regarding matters affecting the campus community (e.g. mail schedule changes in policies services provided etc) | 85.7% | 14 | 75.0% | 16 | ||
| Overall satisfaction with the services provided | 63.0% | 16 | 87.5% | 16 | 93.3% | 15 |
Rating levels of satisfaction with the following attributes of Payroll Services
| Attribute | 2005 % Sat | 2005 # Resp | 2006 % Sat | 2006 # Resp | 2007 % Sat | 2007 # Resp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ease of use of forms and procedures for timekeeping | 84.0% | 19 | 94.1% | 17 | 82.4% | 17 |
| Timeliness of response to timekeeping questions/requests | 94.0% | 18 | 100.0% | 17 | 94.1% | 17 |
| Effective problem resolution | 68.0% | 19 | 82.4% | 17 | 76.5% | 17 |
| Effectiveness of Payroll recommendations | 83.0% | 18 | 86.7% | 15 | 93.3% | 15 |
| Working relations with your department | 95.0% | 19 | 94.1% | 17 | 88.2% | 17 |
| Easy to use Payroll Services website | 90.0% | 10 | 90.9% | 11 | ||
| Usefulness of payroll self service functions (myCSULB) | 80.0% | 15 | 100.0% | 12 | ||
| Provides adequate communication regarding matters affecting employees (e.g. pay schedule, policy changes, deduction explanations, services provided, etc) | 64.7% | 17 | 62.5% | 16 | ||
| Overall satisfaction with the services provided | 100.0% | 19 | 94.1% | 17 | 94.1% | 17 |
Rating level of satisfaction with the following attributes of Purchasing
| Attribute | 2005 % Sat | 2005 # Resp | 2007 % Sat | 2007 # Resp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accessibility of staff when needed | 88.0% | 17 | 87.5% | 16 |
| Knowledgeable staff | 94.0% | 17 | 100.0% | 17 |
| Professionalism of staff | 94.0% | 17 | 82.4% | 17 |
| Clear, easy to follow policies and procedures | 88.0% | 17 | 87.5% | 16 |
| Effective problem resolution | 76.9% | 13 | ||
| Accommodating rush and emergency orders | 94.0% | 16 | 100.0% | 14 |
| Ease of submitting a requisition | 94.0% | 16 | 88.2% | 17 |
| Time between initiating a requisition and issuing a purchase order | 81.0% | 16 | 85.7% | 14 |
| Timeliness of receiving goods and/or services from time of requisition | 87.0% | 15 | 87.5% | 16 |
| Availability of information on the status of my order | 81.0% | 16 | 81.3% | 16 |
| Promoting competitive bidding & reducing sole source reliance | 91.0% | 11 | 80.0% | 10 |
| Considers my needs when selecting new vendors | 55.6% | 9 | ||
| Taking advantage of all vendor discounts that are allowed | 93.0% | 14 | 81.8% | 11 |
| Efficiency of Procurement Credit Card purchase option | 100.0% | 18 | 62.5% | 16 |
| Usefulness of Procurement Credit Card purchase option | 100.0% | 18 | 88.2% | 17 |
| Overall satisfaction with the services provided | 94.0% | 17 | 94.1% | 17 |
Purchasing’s high priority Opportunities for Improvement relate to training and perception and will be addressed by the combined action items.
Rating levels of satisfaction with the following attributes of Staff Personnel - Recruiting
| Attribute | 2005 % Sat | 2005 # Resp | 2007 % Sat | 2007 # Resp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Timeliness of hiring process for staff/management positions | 52.0% | 25 | 100.0% | 17 |
| Communication on status of recruitment | 66.7% | 24 | 94.1% | 17 |
| Knowledge and professionalism of staff | 81.8% | 22 | 94.1% | 17 |
| Ease of use of forms and procedures for hiring | 65.0% | 20 | 93.8% | 16 |
| Advice on how to effectively advertise for open positions | 100.0% | 17 | ||
| Advice on how to effectively recruit for open positions (classification, salary range, interview strategies, etc) | 100.0% | 17 | ||
| The recruiting department as a partner for finding the best new hires | 92.9% | 17 | ||
| Overall satisfaction with services provided | 70.8% | 24 | 100.0% | 17 |